The Department of Defense's current approach to electromagnetic spectrum policy is drawing criticism for its inefficiency, akin to firing million-dollar missiles at low-cost drones. A new analysis from War on the Rocks argues the Pentagon should shift to a commercial-first spectrum model, prioritizing commercial, allied, and strategic returns over exclusive military control of prime mid-band frequencies.
The strategic implication is one of opportunity cost: by reserving these bands for relatively low-throughput uses like radars and satellite communications, the military may be forgoing substantial economic and allied benefits. The analysis suggests current allocation reflects legacy policy choices rather than optimized strategic planning, potentially weakening U.S. competitiveness in emerging technologies.
Allied and partner nations, which increasingly rely on shared commercial spectrum for both economic growth and military interoperability, could benefit from a more flexible U.S. approach. However, the Pentagon's national security lens has historically prioritized assured access for electronic warfare and navigation systems, creating tension with commercial interests.
Budgetary considerations are not directly addressed in the analysis, but the proposed shift could generate significant revenue through spectrum auctions or leasing while reducing long-term procurement costs. The piece does not specify a timeline or propose specific legislative changes.
The analysis, however, does not fully account for the risks of degraded military performance in contested electromagnetic environments. A commercial-first model could compromise the Pentagon's ability to maintain robust electronic warfare capabilities and assured communications during conflict, a trade-off that demands rigorous operational testing before implementation.